Economic Impact Report · Minot, North Dakota · November 2026

At $100/ton the Beneficiation Fee costs more per ton than the City of Minot Landfill's $51 gate rate. What the CSA returns instead is a Circular Royalty™ that exceeds the fee from Year 2, no City or County capital, and landfill airspace kept in reserve.

This report claims no disposal saving. The case rests on the royalty, zero public capital, landfill life and a manufacturing destination for the material.

The relationship structure. Under the Circular Supply Agreement (CSA), the community (City of Minot and Ward County, referred to here as the County) becomes the Feedstock Provider to a Carbotura Advanced Circular Manufacturing (ACM) facility. Manufacturing feedstock transfers to Carbotura under the CSA; the County pays the Beneficiation Fee (TMC Fee) and receives the Circular Royalty™. This is a supply arrangement, not a service contract.

Audience: Municipal Finance / Legal + Elected Officials (SP-01 + SP-02) Document role: Delta model only — State A vs State B Predecessor documents: Waste Study (State A) · Proposal (State B) Version: v2.0 · November 2026
Inherited Flags — from Proposal / Registry

Beneficiation Fee (TMC Fee): $100/ton in Year 1, escalating 2.5%/yr — the bottom of the standard $100–$150/ton range. It is above the City of Minot Landfill's published MSW gate rate of $51/ton; no disposal saving is claimed.

Landfill intake — about 82,000 t/yr MSW plus about 68,800 t/yr inert, from six counties, estimated from a vendor case study of the City landfill (undated, written after the 2011 flood; retrieved 2026-11-10). To be confirmed at the Deployment Study.

Timeline — 12–24 months from permit issuance to commercial operation for Phase Initial. No calendar dates are assumed. Phase Medium is a later step, when the County chooses.

Feedstock composition — ESTIMATED using Carbotura's standard municipal feedstock profile. Stream-specific characterization deferred to the Deployment Study.

Sections

§1Introduction and Decision Summary

§1.1What This Report Measures

This EIR quantifies the difference between two futures for the Minot area's manufacturing-feedstock streams over a 30-year horizon.

  • State A (Without Carbotura). The current system continues. Material goes to the City of Minot Landfill at the published MSW gate rate ($51/ton, effective 2025-01-01). No royalty accrues, and landfill airspace is consumed at the current rate.
  • State B (With Carbotura). A CSA with a 30-year term executes. ACM Phase Initial (100 TPD) reaches commercial operation 12–24 months from permit issuance. The Beneficiation Fee applies to committed tonnage in place of the gate rate. The Circular Royalty™ begins 13 months after Carbotura's receipt of each Beneficiation Fee payment, with the multiplier rising 1 percentage point per year. Phase Medium (200 TPD) is a later step, when the County chooses.

This report does not re-diagnose State A (the Waste Study's role) and does not re-define State B (Proposal's role). Its function is only the delta.

§1.2Decision Summary Table

ItemPhase Initial (100 TPD)Phase Medium (200 TPD)
Committed tonnage36,500 t/yr (≈45% of reported landfill MSW intake)73,000 t/yr (≈89%)
State A — same tonnage at the published $51/ton gate rate (Year 1)$1.86M$3.72M
State B — Beneficiation Fee paid, Year 1$3.65M$7.29M
State B — Circular Royalty™ received, Year 2$4.38M$8.76M
State B — 30-year gross: fee paid / royalty received~$160.2M / ~$207.3M~$320.5M / ~$414.7M
Carbotura capital (no City or County capital)$75M$130M ($75M first module + $55M)
Capital obligation to County$0$0
Regulatory Predicate Transition (RPT) Standing condition. Both parties commit to the dewaste pathway; the endpoint is categorical (manufacturing NAICS 31–33, not waste-management NAICS 562xxx), and interim bridging authorities may apply. Manufacturing classification is actively pursued; nothing in the CSA is contingent on it.
Key data gapsConfirmation of landfill intake; stream-specific feedstock composition; candidate site (no parcel identified)
Timing12–24 months from permit issuance to commercial operation for Phase Initial. Phase Medium when the County chooses. No calendar deadline.

Royalty received, receipts basis: paid 13 months in arrears; Year n = M(n−1) × BF(n−1). Illustrative.

The honest comparison

$100/ton is above the City of Minot Landfill's published MSW gate rate of $51/ton (effective 2025-01-01, minotnd.gov). Carbotura claims no disposal saving. The State A gate-rate figures above are shown for comparison only; they are not netted against the fee or the royalty.

§1.3Fiscal vs. Regional Economic Separation

Required statement

County fiscal effects (Circular Royalty™ receipts, Beneficiation Fee outflows) and regional economic impact (employment, tax base) are distinct categories. They are not interchangeable. Royalty receipts flow to the County treasury; regional economic impact flows to the broader Minot economy and does not appear on the County balance sheet. This EIR maintains that separation throughout.

§2State A Baseline

Source: Waste Study and published City and NDDEQ records. No new diagnosis introduced.

§2.1The Current System

ItemValueSource Type
City of Minot LandfillOwned and operated by the City of Minot (Public Works, Solid Waste Management Division), 4450 37th Ave SW; NDDEQ permit 0272Verified
Reported intakeAbout 82,000 t/yr MSW plus about 68,800 t/yr inert, from six counties (estimate: vendor case study, post-2011, retrieved 2026-11-10)Reported
Second permitted MSW landfill in Ward CountyMcDaniel Landfill Inc, Sawyer; NDDEQ permit 0326Verified
Residential collectionCity Sanitation, twice weekly; carts $15 / $17.50 / $20 per month (35 / 65 / 95 gal)Verified
Commercial collection termsNot publicly documented; not stated hereData gap
Population servedWard County 68,233 (2025 estimate; 68,427 in 2024), down about 2.1% since 2020; City of Minot about 47,300; metro (Ward, McHenry, Renville) 75,694Verified

§2.2State A Cost Structure

Cost ElementPer-TonAnnual, Phase Initial tonnageAnnual, Phase Medium tonnageSource Type
Published MSW gate rate (effective 2025-01-01)$51$1.86M$3.72MVerified
Published inert gate rate (effective 2025-01-01)$37——Verified
Method note

The gate rate is set by the City through its budget cycle. No escalation of the gate rate is modeled here, and no collection or haul cost is added to it. Commercial collection terms are not publicly documented and are not stated.

§2.3Landfill Life and Airspace

Cell 7 was approved in January 2023 at about $2.36M and is expected to provide roughly 5–7 years of capacity. In 2017 the City bought 320 acres for $4M to extend the site's life by 60 years or more (minotnd.gov). Committing 36,500 t/yr (Phase Initial) or 73,000 t/yr (Phase Medium) to manufacturing removes that tonnage from the landfill, so each cell lasts longer and future cell spending is pushed further out.

§2.4State A Environmental and Structural Position

  • Carbon position (State A): Committed feedstock continues to landfill; methane from landfilled organics continues per the landfill's operating profile.
  • PFAS: NDDEQ monitors PFAS, including landfill leachate since 2018. North Dakota has no state PFAS rule, and no regulatory cost step is modeled here.
  • Rate-setting authority: The City sets the gate rate as a municipal budget decision.
  • Capital exposure: Cell expansion is funded by the City and recovered through its rates.

§3State B Deployment Baseline

Source: Proposal EIR Input Block. No re-derivation.

§3.1Inherited Flags Declaration

Flags carried forward from the Proposal and Registry (disclosed above): landfill intake as reported, unconfirmed · feedstock composition ESTIMATED · Phase Medium at the County's election · no candidate parcel identified. Bismarck and Grand Forks partnerships are possible later additions under separate agreements; they are not sized and are not part of this report.

§3.2Deployment Configuration

PhaseTPDACM Modulest/yrShare of reported MSW intakeCarbotura CapExTiming
Phase Initial100136,500≈45%$75M12–24 months from permit issuance to commercial operation
Phase Medium200273,000≈89%$130M ($75M + $55M)A later step, when the County chooses

§3.3Economic Terms

ParameterValue
Beneficiation Fee (TMC Fee) Year 1 · Minot$100 / ton — the bottom of the standard $100–$150/ton range
Fee escalator2.5% / year
Royalty multiplier Year 1120% of that year's Beneficiation Fee
Multiplier escalator+1 percentage point / year, applied to each year's escalated fee
Royalty timingBegins 13 months after Carbotura's receipt of each Beneficiation Fee payment; rolling monthly
CSA term30 years from Phase Initial commercial operation
Capital obligation to counterparty$0 (Carbotura-financed, owned and operated)

§3.5Sequence

StepTiming
LOI / MOU → Term Sheet → CSA executionSet by the County's decision process
Deployment Study and NDDEQ pre-application engagementAfter CSA execution
Phase Initial commercial operation12–24 months from permit issuance
First Circular Royalty™ payment13 months after Carbotura's receipt of the first Beneficiation Fee payment
Phase Medium (200 TPD)A later step, when the County chooses
CSA term end30 years from Phase Initial commercial operation

§3.6Phase Delta Map

State A infrastructure (grey pin) and an indicative candidate ACM area (emerald square). No parcel has been identified; candidate areas would sit in Minot's M1 / M2 / M3 industrial zoning districts and remain unverified.

Interactive map requires a Google Maps API key.

Set GOOGLE_MAPS_API_KEY in config.js.

Right panel remains fully functional without a map key.

§4Delta Analysis

§4.1Three Delta Components

The State A → State B transition produces three independent fiscal components, each quantified separately:

  1. Beneficiation Fee paid — applies to committed tonnage in place of the gate rate. At $100/ton it is higher per ton than the $51 gate rate; no saving is claimed.
  2. Circular Royalty™ received — a new inflow to the County treasury. $0 in Year 1 (13-month lag); rolling monthly thereafter; the multiplier rises 1 percentage point per year.
  3. Residual State A cost — gate-rate cost continuing before commercial operation and for tonnage not committed under the CSA (the inert stream and the remaining MSW).

"The Beneficiation Fee, the Circular Royalty™ and any residual gate-rate cost are quantified separately."

"At steady state, the Circular Royalty™ is designed to exceed the Beneficiation Fee on a per-ton basis."

"Circular Royalty™ payments begin 13 months after Carbotura's receipt of each Beneficiation Fee payment and ramp to full run-rate on a rolling basis."

§4.2Phase-by-Phase Comparative Table

PhaseACM Volume (t/yr)State A gate rate / tonFee / ton, Year 1Royalty received / ton, Year 2Fee paid, Year 1Royalty received, Year 2Capital
Phase Initial36,500$51$100.00$120.00$3.65M$4.38M$0
Phase Medium73,000$51$100.00$120.00$7.29M$8.76M$0

Royalty received, receipts basis: paid 13 months in arrears; Year n = M(n−1) × BF(n−1). Illustrative. Phase Medium figures assume 200 TPD from its own Year 1.

Pre-Royalty Period Separation

Year 1 and the period beginning 13 months after Carbotura's receipt of each Beneficiation Fee payment have materially different fiscal characteristics. They must not be combined.

  • Year 1 (Pre-Royalty, Months 1–12): County pays the Beneficiation Fee at $100/ton. Receives $0 in Circular Royalty™.
  • Royalty Ramp (Year 2, Months 13–24): Circular Royalty™ ramps to full run-rate on a rolling basis (120% × that year's fee, rising each year).
  • Steady state (Year 3 onward): royalty received per ton stays above the fee per ton, and the gap widens every year.

§4.430-Year Gross Schedule — Phase Initial (100 TPD)

36,500 t/yr held constant. Fee and royalty are separate gross amounts.

YearFee / tonRoyalty received / tonBeneficiation Fee paidCircular Royalty™ received
1$100.00$0 (pre-royalty)$3.65M$0
2$102.50$120.00$3.74M$4.38M
3$105.06$124.02$3.83M$4.53M
5$110.38$132.46$4.03M$4.83M
10$124.89$155.96$4.56M$5.69M
15$141.30$183.34$5.16M$6.69M
20$159.87$215.23$5.84M$7.86M
25$180.87$252.34$6.60M$9.21M
30$204.64$295.48$7.47M$10.79M
30-year gross~$160.2M~$207.3M

Royalty received, receipts basis: paid 13 months in arrears; Year n = M(n−1) × BF(n−1). Illustrative.

§4.530-Year Gross Schedule — Phase Medium (200 TPD)

73,000 t/yr held constant, counted from Phase Medium's own Year 1.

YearFee / tonRoyalty received / tonBeneficiation Fee paidCircular Royalty™ received
1$100.00$0 (pre-royalty)$7.30M$0
2$102.50$120.00$7.48M$8.76M
3$105.06$124.02$7.67M$9.05M
5$110.38$132.46$8.06M$9.67M
10$124.89$155.96$9.12M$11.38M
15$141.30$183.34$10.32M$13.38M
20$159.87$215.23$11.67M$15.71M
25$180.87$252.34$13.20M$18.42M
30$204.64$295.48$14.94M$21.57M
30-year gross~$320.5M~$414.7M

Royalty received, receipts basis: paid 13 months in arrears; Year n = M(n−1) × BF(n−1). Illustrative.

§4.6Gross Fiscal Chart

Gross Fiscal Position — Beneficiation Fee / Circular Royalty™
Two independent gross streams shown separately. The royalty exceeds the fee from Year 2 and the gap widens.
Carbotura Circular Royalty™ formula · $100/ton fee Year 1 (+2.5%/yr) · 120% multiplier Year 1, +1pp/yr · receipts basis (13-month lag) · annual view at Phase Initial 36,500 t/yr · illustrative
Year-by-Year — Full Schedule, Both Phases (Years 1–30)
YearFee / tonRoyalty received / ton100 TPD fee paid100 TPD royalty received200 TPD fee paid200 TPD royalty received
1$100.00$0 (pre-royalty)$3.65M$0$7.30M$0
2$102.50$120.00$3.74M$4.38M$7.48M$8.76M
3$105.06$124.02$3.83M$4.53M$7.67M$9.05M
4$107.69$128.18$3.93M$4.68M$7.86M$9.36M
5$110.38$132.46$4.03M$4.83M$8.06M$9.67M
6$113.14$136.87$4.13M$5.00M$8.26M$9.99M
7$115.97$141.43$4.23M$5.16M$8.47M$10.32M
8$118.87$146.12$4.34M$5.33M$8.68M$10.67M
9$121.84$150.96$4.45M$5.51M$8.89M$11.02M
10$124.89$155.96$4.56M$5.69M$9.12M$11.38M
11$128.01$161.10$4.67M$5.88M$9.34M$11.76M
12$131.21$166.41$4.79M$6.07M$9.58M$12.15M
13$134.49$171.88$4.91M$6.27M$9.81M$12.55M
14$137.85$177.53$5.03M$6.48M$10.06M$12.96M
15$141.30$183.34$5.16M$6.69M$10.32M$13.38M
16$144.83$189.34$5.29M$6.91M$10.57M$13.82M
17$148.45$195.52$5.42M$7.14M$10.84M$14.27M
18$152.16$201.89$5.55M$7.37M$11.11M$14.74M
19$155.96$208.46$5.69M$7.61M$11.38M$15.22M
20$159.87$215.23$5.84M$7.86M$11.67M$15.71M
21$163.86$222.21$5.98M$8.11M$11.96M$16.22M
22$167.96$229.41$6.13M$8.37M$12.26M$16.75M
23$172.16$236.82$6.27M$8.64M$12.57M$17.29M
24$176.46$244.46$6.44M$8.92M$12.88M$17.85M
25$180.87$252.34$6.60M$9.21M$13.20M$18.42M
26$185.39$260.46$6.77M$9.51M$13.53M$19.01M
27$190.03$268.82$6.94M$9.81M$13.87M$19.62M
28$194.78$277.44$7.11M$10.13M$14.22M$20.25M
29$199.65$286.33$7.29M$10.45M$14.57M$20.90M
30$204.64$295.48$7.47M$10.79M$14.94M$21.57M

Royalty received, receipts basis: paid 13 months in arrears; Year n = M(n−1) × BF(n−1). Illustrative.

Fee and royalty are independent gross transactions and are never netted. Tonnage held constant within each phase.

§5System-Level Impact

§5.1Employment Delta

Required disclaimer

§5.1 reflects regional employment impacts, not County treasury receipts. These flow to the Minot-area workforce; they do not flow to the County general fund.

PhaseDirect jobs (estimated)Indirect jobs (roughly 3×)Basis
Phase Initial (100 TPD)~25~75Estimated standard per-TPD scaling
Phase Medium (200 TPD)~50~150Estimated standard per-TPD scaling

§5.2Environmental Delta (design intent)

AttributeState AState B (design intent)
Carbon position (committed feedstock)Landfill methane + transport emissionsNo combustion; carbon held in solid Circular Materials such as synthetic graphite; near-zero emissions
Landfill diversion0% of committed feedstock~100% of committed feedstock converted to manufactured outputs (36,500 t/yr at Phase Initial; 73,000 t/yr at Phase Medium)
Internal energyN/AHydrogen generated and used on site to run PEM fuel cells; no power, electricity or hydrogen sold
External hydrogen offtakeN/ANone — internal use only

§5.3PFAS Structural Delta

State A: NDDEQ monitors PFAS, including landfill leachate since 2018. North Dakota has no state PFAS rule; PFAS in landfilled material stays in the landfill and its leachate.

State B: PFAS molecules cannot survive elemental dissociation; they are fully broken down in downstream processing at 1,800–3,000°C in both OmniCrude™ streams (design basis). Stream-specific confirmation is deferred to the Deployment Study.

§5.4What Continuing State A Means

  1. State A is the lower per-ton cost today. The $51/ton gate rate is below the $100/ton Beneficiation Fee, and this report says so.
  2. No royalty. State A produces no income stream; State B produces a Circular Royalty™ that exceeds the fee from Year 2.
  3. Airspace keeps being consumed. Each cell fills at the current rate, and the next cell decision arrives sooner.
  4. No manufacturing destination. The material stays in the landfill rather than becoming Circular Materials.

§6Risk and Sensitivity

§6.1Structured Risk Register

#RiskDriverBearerQuantificationMitigationResidual
1Landfill intake confirmation~82,000 t/yr MSW estimated from a vendor case study, post-2011BothThe 45% / 89% shares move with the confirmed figureDeployment Study tonnage review with the CityLow
2Technology performanceMCR performance against the production specificationCarbotura$0 to County (Carbotura-financed, owned and operated)Verification chain (design intent): component certified → module certified by an ASI → MASI final integration, test and burn-in at FAT → SAT and SIT certify CODLow
3TimelinePermitting, financing, deploymentBothRoyalty start moves with commercial operation; no calendar target is assumed12–24 months from permit issuance to commercial operation; cure provisionsMedium
4Fee above gate rate$100/ton fee vs. $51/ton published gate rateCountyYear 1 at Phase Initial tonnage: fee $3.65M vs. $1.86M at the gate rateStated openly. From Year 2 the royalty received ($4.38M) exceeds the fee paidMedium
5Alternative disposal optionsCity rate decisions; a second permitted MSW landfill in the countyBothCommitted tonnage could be routed elsewhere without a contract30-year CSA term; MAFV (Minimum Annual Feedstock Volume)Low
6PFAS regulatoryNo ND state rule; NDDEQ monitoring onlyCounty (State A)Not quantifiedElemental dissociation of committed feedstock; feedstock specification in the CSALow
7Later regional additionsBismarck / Grand Forks, separate agreementsBothNot sized; no effect on Phase Initial or Phase MediumHandled, if ever, under separate agreementsLow
8NDDEQ permittingNDAC 33.1-20 and NDCC 23.1-08CarboturaPermit timing drives the commercial operation dateNDDEQ pre-application engagement at the Deployment StudyLow
9Manufacturing classification confirmationClassification outcome; North Dakota has no advanced-recycling or manufacturing-classification statuteBothNone: no CSA term depends on itRPT: both parties commit, the endpoint is categorical, interim bridging authorities may applyLow (RPT-aligned)
10Macro inflation / interest-rateSPV financing close in an elevated-rate environmentCarbotura$0 to County; affects Carbotura WACC and SPV termsStaged deployment; standard refinancing provisionsLow (to County)
11Workforce availability — regionalSkilled operations and technical hires in north-central North DakotaCarboturaHire delay = commercial operation slip riskLocal-hire targeting; apprenticeship partnerships with regional institutionsLow
12Site environmental reviewNo parcel identified; candidate areas unverifiedCarboturaMitigation cost or site changeStandard environmental review at the Deployment Study; M1 / M2 / M3 zoning screenLow

§6.2Feedstock Variability Sensitivity (±20%)

PhaseBase TPD−20%+20%Year-2 royalty received impact
Phase Initial10080120±$0.88M annual
Phase Medium200160240±$1.75M annual

§6.3Gate-Rate Comparison — No Saving Claimed

What the comparison shows

At the published $51/ton gate rate, the $100/ton Beneficiation Fee is the higher per-ton cost, and this report claims no disposal saving.

The reason to proceed is the royalty: in Year 2 the royalty received per ton ($120.00) is above that year's fee ($102.50), and under the formula the gap widens every year. Fee and royalty are reported as separate gross amounts and are never netted.

§6.4Royalty Escalator Sensitivity (0 / +1 / +2 pp)

EscalatorMultiplier applied in Year 30 receiptsYear 30 royalty received / tonYear 30, Phase InitialYear 30, Phase Medium
0 pp/yr (no escalation)120%$239.58$8.74M$17.49M
+1 pp/yr (base case)148%$295.48$10.79M$21.57M
+2 pp/yr (upside)176%$351.38$12.83M$25.65M

Royalty received, receipts basis: paid 13 months in arrears; Year n = M(n−1) × BF(n−1). Illustrative.

§6.5Timing Sensitivity

EventTiming
Phase Initial commercial operation12–24 months from permit issuance
First royalty13 months after Carbotura's receipt of the first Beneficiation Fee payment
Effect of a delayThe 30-year schedule starts later by the same interval; the per-ton figures do not change

§7Decision Timing

§7.1Binding Constraints

  1. Deployment interval. Phase Initial reaches commercial operation 12–24 months from permit issuance. No calendar target is assumed.
  2. Classification pathway. Manufacturing classification (NAICS 31–33) is actively pursued; nothing in the CSA is contingent on it.
  3. Landfill cell cycle. Cell 7 was approved in January 2023 with roughly 5–7 years of capacity. Committing tonnage before the next cell decision lets the City plan airspace knowing how much material is leaving the landfill.

§7.2Decision Sequence

DecisionWhat follows
Authorize LOI / MOUTerm Sheet, then CSA execution
CSA executionDeployment Study; NDDEQ pre-application engagement; permit application
Permit issuancePhase Initial commercial operation within 12–24 months
Phase Medium electionWhen the County chooses

§7.3Irreversibility Mechanism

Finding — No External Deadline

Minot faces no landfill closure order and no diversion mandate. The timing question is the City's own airspace planning: each year of State A uses cell capacity that Phase Initial or Phase Medium would otherwise keep in reserve.

Manufacturing classification (NAICS 31–33) is actively pursued for every engagement; nothing is contingent on it.

§7.4Optionality Matrix

DecisionPhase InitialPhase MediumLater regional additions
Proceed with Phase InitialCommercial operation 12–24 months from permit issuancePreserved, at the County's electionSeparate agreements, unsized
Proceed with Phase Initial and Phase Medium togetherAs aboveCommitted at CSA executionSeparate agreements, unsized
DeferNo commitment; airspace consumption continues——

§8Effects Summary

No new figures introduced. All values trace to §1–§7.

§8.1Fiscal Effects (County Treasury)

PeriodBeneficiation Fee paid (100 TPD)Circular Royalty™ received (100 TPD)Beneficiation Fee paid (200 TPD)Circular Royalty™ received (200 TPD)
Year 1$3.65M$0 (pre-royalty)$7.29M$0 (pre-royalty)
Year 2$3.74M$4.38M$7.48M$8.76M
Year 10$4.56M$5.69M$9.12M$11.38M
Year 30$7.47M$10.79M$14.94M$21.57M
30-year gross~$160.2M~$207.3M~$320.5M~$414.7M

Royalty received, receipts basis: paid 13 months in arrears; Year n = M(n−1) × BF(n−1). Illustrative. Two independent gross transactions, never netted.

§8.2Regional Economic Effects

Disclaimer

§8.2 figures are regional economic effects, not County treasury receipts. They do not appear on the County balance sheet.

Phase at full operationDirect jobs (estimated)Indirect jobs (roughly 3×)
Phase Initial~25~75
Phase Medium~50~150

Carbotura's capital ($75M at 100 TPD; $130M at 200 TPD) is privately owned. Local property tax treatment is not modeled here.

§8.3Environmental Effects

Disclaimer

§8.3 reflects design intent. Stream-specific environmental performance verification is deferred to the Deployment Study and operational reporting.

  • Carbon position: no combustion and near-zero emissions under State B (design intent); landfill methane continues under State A.
  • Landfill diversion: ~100% of committed streams converted to manufactured outputs under State B (design intent); 0% under State A.
  • PFAS: broken down in downstream processing under State B (design basis); retained in landfill and leachate under State A.

§8.4Structural Effects

  • Pricing: committed tonnage moves from the City's annually set gate rate to the CSA fee schedule ($100/ton, +2.5%/yr, known for 30 years); non-committed tonnage stays at the gate rate.
  • Capital exposure: $0 to the County under State B. Cell expansion remains a City cost, but cells fill more slowly.
  • Classification: State B pursues manufacturing classification (NAICS 31–33) on an RPT-aligned basis; nothing is contingent on it.

§8.5Unresolved Data Gaps

GapImpactResolution Path
Landfill intake (~82,000 t/yr MSW, vendor case study, post-2011)Affects the 45% / 89% share figuresDeployment Study tonnage review with the City
Stream-specific feedstock compositionAffects product mix, not the fee or royalty formulaDeployment Study characterization
Commercial collection termsAffects how committed tonnage is routedDeployment Study review with the City
NDDEQ permit pathway (NDAC 33.1-20; NDCC 23.1-08)Affects the commercial operation dateDeployment Study NDDEQ pre-application engagement
Candidate siteNo parcel identified; M1 / M2 / M3 districts to be screenedSite selection and environmental review
Manufacturing classification confirmationNone on the CSA; nothing is contingent on itActively pursued

ASources and Methodology

State A baseline: Waste Study (Document 1 of the package) and the public records below. State B baseline: Proposal EIR Input Block (Section 2 of engagement).

Beneficiation Fee: $100/ton Year 1, escalating 2.5%/yr — the bottom of the standard $100–$150/ton range.

Circular Royalty™ formula: Royalty per ton (Year n, accrual) = Mn × BFn, where BFn = $100 × 1.025(n−1) and Mn = 120% + (n−1) percentage points. Tables in this report are on a receipts basis: the royalty is paid 13 months in arrears, so Year n receipts = Mn−1 × BFn−1. 365 operating days.

Phase sizing: Phase Initial 100 TPD; Phase Medium 200 TPD. Employment: estimated from standard per-TPD scaling. Timeline: 12–24 months from permit issuance to commercial operation. Environmental: design intent per Carbotura's ACM production specification.

Public records:

  • City of Minot Landfill — ownership, address, Cell 7, 2017 land purchase: minotnd.gov/288/Landfill
  • Gate rates effective 2025-01-01 (MSW $51/ton; inert $37/ton): minotnd.gov/691/Landfill-Rates
  • Residential collection and cart rates: minotnd.gov/282
  • Active permitted MSW landfills (permits 0272, 0326): deq.nd.gov
  • Population (Ward County 68,233, 2025 estimate): Minot Daily News, 2026-03-26, minotdailynews.com
  • Landfill intake (~82,000 t/yr MSW; ~68,800 t/yr inert; six counties): estimate: vendor case study, post-2011, retrieved 2026-11-10
  • State framework: NDAC 33.1-20 (solid waste) and NDCC 23.1-08

BEIR Glossary Additions

Full document-suite glossary in Waste Study Appendix D. EIR-specific terms:

  • Published Gate Rate — The City of Minot Landfill's published per-ton rate ($51/ton MSW from 2025-01-01). Used in this report as the State A reference only.
  • Receipts Basis — Royalty shown in the year it is received. Because payment runs 13 months in arrears, Year n receipts reflect Year n−1 tonnage, multiplier and fee.
  • Pre-Royalty Period — Months 1–12 (Year 1) of Phase Initial operations. Fee paid; $0 royalty due to the 13-month lag.
  • Royalty Ramp Period — Months 13–24 (Year 2). Rolling monthly royalty payments begin and ramp to full run-rate.
  • Steady-State Period — Year 3 onward. Royalty received per ton exceeds the fee per ton, and the gap widens each year.
  • Delta Model — Comparative analytical framework quantifying the State A → State B transition. Does not re-diagnose State A or re-define State B.

★Basis of Presentation

This EIR quantifies the State A → State B transition for Minot and Ward County, North Dakota, over a 30-year horizon. State A figures come from the Waste Study and published City and NDDEQ records; State B figures come from the Proposal EIR Input Block. Each value is classified by confidence tier.

ParameterValue AppliedBasisConfidence
Phase Initial 100 TPD / 36,500 t/yr12–24 months from permit issuance to commercial operationArchitect sizing decision, 2026-11-10Locked
Phase Medium 200 TPD / 73,000 t/yrWhen the County choosesArchitect sizing decision, 2026-11-10Locked
Beneficiation Fee Year 1 = $100/tonEscalating 2.5%/yrthe bottom of the standard $100–$150/ton rangeLocked
State A published MSW gate rate = $51/tonHeld flat; no escalation modeledCity of Minot, effective 2025-01-01Verified
Landfill intake ~82,000 t/yr MSWDenominator for the 45% / 89% sharesEstimate: vendor case study, post-2011, retrieved 2026-11-10Estimated
Employment ~25 / ~50 directIndirect roughly 3×Standard per-TPD scalingEstimated
Operator verificationCity of Minot Landfill (municipal, permit 0272); McDaniel Landfill Inc, Sawyer (permit 0326)NDDEQ active MSW landfill list; City recordsVerified

Unresolved Data Gaps

  • Landfill intake confirmation — Deployment Study tonnage review.
  • Stream-specific feedstock composition — Deployment Study characterization.
  • Candidate site — no parcel identified.
  • NDDEQ permit pathway — pre-application engagement at the Deployment Study.
  • Manufacturing classification confirmation — actively pursued; nothing contingent on it.

Confidence tiers: Locked = Architect decision or contractually standard Verified = sourced to named public record Estimated = Carbotura-modeled with stated methodology or reported without a date Provisional = pre-Term Sheet placeholder.

Was this EIR useful?