§1Transaction Structure
§1.0Regulatory Predicate Transition (RPT)
Advanced Circular Manufacturing is a manufacturing process, not a waste-management activity. Microwave Catalytic Reforming operates in an anoxic, oxygen-free, sub-atmospheric environment — mechanistically incompatible with combustion or biological degradation. ACM does not fit within the waste domain and does not operate under waste-domain statutes. The Regulatory Predicate Transition (RPT) — also framed as the dewaste pathway — is the coordinated regulatory shift from legacy disposal-predicate statutes onto manufacturing-predicate classifications. 100% elemental recycling of the municipal material stream requires this transition. Manufacturing NAICS 325180 · 325998 · 327992 · 331110 · 331314 · 331492 (6-code ACM set) plus EPA RCRA §1004(27) / 40 CFR §261.2(e) exclusion pathway in the US; ISIC Rev.4 20-25 + UN CPC 89 internationally. In many jurisdictions the required authorities already exist in latent form within existing statutes; in others the transition requires primary-authority amendments. The Joint Working Group phase includes a regulatory engagement workstream to shepherd the RPT alongside site permitting. Both parties commit to the RPT pathway. Carbotura brings the process-classification evidence, regulatory engagement expertise from prior ACM deployments, and the legal-technical framework. The counterparty brings the standing to engage the local regulator, the political mandate for the transition, and — where applicable — legacy statutory authorities that can be re-instrumented for manufacturing use. The endpoint is categorical: manufacturing classification across all permitting, licensing, and regulatory contexts. Interim bridging authorities may apply during the transition.
§1.1Commercial Structure
The 30-year CSA is a royalty-producing asset that replaces a waste liability on Ward County's books.
The proposed instrument is a 30-year Circular Supply Agreement (CSA) between Carbotura and the City of Minot / Ward County (anchor counterparty), with optional CSA addenda for Bismarck and Grand Forks partnership entry under separately negotiated instruments. Under the CSA, Ward County becomes the manufacturing feedstock supplier to the ACM facility; Carbotura is the manufacturer that material stream transfers to under the CSA. This is a supply arrangement, not a service contract and not a procurement instrument.
Carbotura's commitments under the CSA
- Build, own, operate, and maintain the ACM facility for 30 years
- Fund 100% of capital construction (BOO structure)
- Pay Circular Royalty™ equal to 120% of contemporaneous Beneficiation Fee per ton, with +1pp/year escalator, paid 13 months in arrears on a rolling monthly basis
- Deliver designed environmental performance (carbon-negative net operations; near-zero landfill diversion of committed streams)
- Commit to the Regulatory Predicate Transition (RPT) as a joint pathway — both parties advance manufacturing classification alongside site permitting
Counterparty's commitments under the CSA
- Direct committed feedstock streams to the ACM facility
- Transport feedstock to the ACM facility — under existing collection contracts, rerouted from the current landfill destination (the City of Minot Landfill) to Carbotura's site. No new collection infrastructure or fleet obligation; the change is a routing swap
- Pay the Beneficiation Fee (TMC Fee) per ton delivered ($75/ton base, 2.5%/year escalator) under the Circular Supply Agreement (CSA)
- Honor 30-year CSA term subject to standard force majeure and cure provisions
To preserve Phase Initial COD Q2 2028, the Council authorization (CSA execution) is required by Q2 2026 — effectively concurrent with engagement start. Each six-month slip past Q2 2026 moves Phase Initial COD month-for-month and reduces Year-2 Royalty receipts by approximately $1.8–$2.2M. At Phase Expanded scale, each six-month slip costs $25–35M cumulative Royalty.
§2Deployment Architecture
§2.1Phase Configuration Table
| Phase | TPD | Modules | TPY | % Inferred Resource | COD Target |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phase Initial | 100 | 1 | 36,500 | 2% | Q2 2028 |
| Stage 2 | 200 | 2 | 73,000 | 4% | Q3 2029 |
| Phase Medium | 400 | 4 | 146,000 | 8% | Q4 2030 |
| Stage 4 | 1,000 | 10 | 365,000 | 20% | Q1 2032 |
| Phase Expanded | 2,000 | 20 | 730,000 | 40% | Q2 2033 |
Module math: ceil(TPD/100). All CODs anchored to T0 = Q2 2026 per Carbotura standard deployment schedule.
§2.2BOO Capital Structure
Zero counterparty capital expenditure. Zero construction debt on County books. Zero operating liability post-COD. Ward County's sole financial obligation under the CSA is the per-ton Beneficiation Fee. Carbotura funds 100% of project cost through institutional capital under separate SPV structuring. The County's general fund, debt capacity, bonding authority, and credit rating are unaffected.
§2.3Feedstock Stream Coverage by Phase
| Stream | Phase Initial | Phase Medium | Phase Expanded | Access Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward County MSW (residential + commercial) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | Immediate |
| Ward County C&D residuals | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | Immediate |
| Ward County industrial / commercial special | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | Immediate |
| Ward County WWTP biosolids | optional | ✓ | ✓ | Conditional |
| Renville / McHenry County (adjacent) | partial | ✓ | Conditional | |
| Bismarck metro extension | ✓ | Partnership pending | ||
| Grand Forks metro extension | ✓ | Partnership pending |
§2.4Site Candidate Analysis
Three priority zones identified within Ward County and the immediate US-2 / US-52 corridor. Final site selection deferred to Deployment Study geotechnical, zoning, and environmental review.
The North Minot US-2 Industrial Corridor (P1) optimizes three logistic and commercial criteria simultaneously: (a) US-2 frontage for inbound feedstock from any Ward County or partner-jurisdiction origin; (b) ~10-mile proximity to City of Minot Landfill supporting alternative-disposition negotiations and route convergence; (c) industrial zoning consistent with NAICS manufacturing classification under the Regulatory Predicate Transition (RPT). P2 is favored only if Ward County base-load feedstock-haul minimization drives selection. P3 is favored only if Phase Expanded with Grand Forks partnership materializes early.
Complete Site Candidate Matrix
| Priority | Zone | Acreage | Zoning | Land Authority | Co-location Advantage | Key Consideration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P1 | North Minot US-2 Industrial Corridor | 80–150 ac (TBD) | M-1 / M-2 Industrial | City of Minot + private (TBD) | US-2 frontage; 10mi from City of Minot Landfill; central feedstock origins | Parcel availability to confirm at Deployment Study |
| P2 | Landfill-Adjacent Industrial — adjacent City of Minot Landfill | 40–80 ac (TBD) | Industrial | Ward County / private (TBD) | Adjacent to existing regional disposal; minimal feedstock haul | Smaller acreage; zoning compatibility to confirm at Deployment Study |
| P3 | South Minot / US-2 Corridor | 100–200 ac (TBD) | Mixed use / Industrial | Ward County / private (TBD) | Greater acreage flexibility; farther from feedstock origins | Environmental review required (wetlands/aquifer proximity TBD at Deployment Study) |
§2.5Finding: Phase Initial Feedstock Sufficiency
Phase Initial 100 TPD is fully supportable from Ward County feedstock streams currently classified IMMEDIATE. No third-party feedstock partnership, no inter-jurisdictional CSA, and no contract-renegotiation precondition required. Stage 2 through Phase Expanded are independently negotiable additions — each unlocks at the County's pace, with no forced sequencing.
Interactive map requires a Google Maps API key.
Set GOOGLE_MAPS_API_KEY in config.js.
Zone cards remain fully functional without a map key.
§3Economic Structure — Beneficiation Fee
FWDC planning basis: ~$82/ton blended (Minot Triangle 50-mile catchment · ND regional gate + collection) — Estimated. Ward County rural ~$82/ton; Bismarck metro ~$108/ton; Grand Forks metro ~$95/ton; weighted by phase ramp. Full FWDC confirmation deferred to Deployment Study.
Beneficiation Fee formula: MAX($100, MIN($150, FWDC − $5))
| Parameter | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| FWDC blended planning basis | ~$82 / ton | Estimated · ND regional |
| Beneficiation Fee floor | $100 / ton | Carbotura standard parameters |
| Beneficiation Fee ceiling | $150 / ton | Carbotura standard parameters |
| Minot Triangle Beneficiation Fee (TMC Fee) — Year 1 | $75 / ton | Verified · Architect override below $100 canonical floor |
| Annual escalator | 2.5% / year | Carbotura standard |
| Phase | TPY | TMC / ton at Phase Y1 | Annual TMC Obligation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phase Initial (facility Y1) | 36,500 | $75.00 | $2,737,500 |
| Stage 2 (facility Y3) | 73,000 | $78.80 | $5,752,400 |
| Phase Medium (facility Y5) | 146,000 | $82.79 | $12,087,340 |
| Stage 4 (facility Y7) | 365,000 | $86.98 | $31,747,700 |
| Phase Expanded (facility Y9) | 730,000 | $91.39 | $66,712,000 |
ESTIMATED — derived from FWDC planning basis and Carbotura standard parameters. Final TMC schedule confirms at CSA execution following Deployment Study FWDC verification.
§4Circular Royalty™
Royalty(m+13) = TMC(m) × Royalty_Rate(m)
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Base royalty rate (Year 1) | 120% of contemporaneous Beneficiation Fee |
| Annual royalty rate escalator | +1 percentage point per year |
| Beneficiation Fee escalator | 2.5% / year |
| Payment lag | 13 months |
| Payment basis | Rolling monthly |
| CSA term | 30 years from Phase Initial COD |
| Pre-royalty period | Months 1–12 (Year 1) |
"Gross cost displacement and Circular Royalty™ cash flow are quantified separately.
"At steady state, the Circular Royalty™ is designed to exceed the Beneficiation Fee on a per-ton basis."
"Circular Royalty™ payments begin 13 months after corresponding Beneficiation Fee payments and ramp to full run-rate on a rolling basis."
Fiscal Period Distinction
The Circular Royalty™ widening spread compounds every year, improving that differential throughout the CSA term.
30-Year Fiscal Schedule — Full Detail
| Year | Avoided Disposal / ton | TMC Paid / ton | Royalty Received / ton |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | $82.00 | −$75.00 | $0.00 (lag) |
| 2 | $84.05 | −$76.88 | +$90.00 |
| 3 | $86.15 | −$78.80 | +$93.02 |
| 5 | $90.50 | −$82.79 | +$99.34 |
| 10 | $103.00 | −$93.67 | +$116.97 |
| 20 | $131.00 | −$119.89 | +$161.42 |
| 30 | $167.00 | −$153.48 | +$221.61 |
Royalty figures are amounts received. The royalty is paid 13 months in arrears, so the figure shown for a year is earned on the previous year’s delivered tonnage.
§5Risk Register
| # | Risk | Key Driver | Bearer | Mitigation | Residual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FWDC verification | $75/ton blended ESTIMATED | Both parties | Deployment Study FWDC audit; TMC floor protects downside | Low |
| 2 | Technology performance | MCR commercial-scale operating performance vs. design | Carbotura (BOO) | Performance guarantees in CSA; conversion efficiency thresholds; reserve account | Low |
| 3 | Timeline slippage | Deployment Study, permitting, financing, construction | Both | Standard 24-month construction window with cure provisions | Medium |
| 4 | Municipal rate-setting exposure | Ward County's sole disposal facility sets gate rates via municipal budget cycle, not private-operator negotiation | County (incumbent contracts) | Staggered phase scaling; CSA hauler-direction provisions | Medium |
| 5 | Competitive procurement | Other waste-conversion operators may approach catchment communities during window | Both | RPT-aligned first-mover position; 30-year exclusivity in CSA | Low |
| 6 | PFAS regulatory | Federal EPA PFAS rules (2026–2027) may step-change stream disposal costs | County (State A exposure); Carbotura (feedstock spec) | ACM designed for PFAS destruction; feedstock spec in CSA | Low |
§6Timeline
| Milestone | Target Date | T0 Offset | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| T0 — Engagement start | Q2 2026 | T0 | ESTIMATED — confirmation pending |
| Council authorization deadline (CSA execution) | Q2 2026 | T0 | Concurrent with engagement start to preserve Phase Initial COD Q2 2028 |
| Deployment Study complete | Q3 2026 | T0 + 3mo | FWDC audit, geotechnical, zoning, permits framework |
| Phase Initial construction start | Q4 2026 | T0 + 6mo | Following financing close |
| Phase Initial COD (100 TPD) | Q2 2028 | T0 + 24mo | Corresponding feedstock delivery; Year 1 TMC begins |
| First Circular Royalty™ payment | Q3 2029 | T0 + 37mo | 13 months after Phase Initial COD; rolling monthly thereafter |
| Stage 2 COD (200 TPD) | Q3 2029 | T0 + 39mo | First scaling step |
| Phase Medium COD (400 TPD) | Q4 2030 | T0 + 54mo | 4 modules |
| Stage 4 COD (1,000 TPD) | Q1 2032 | T0 + 69mo | Conditional on Tier 3 partnership |
| Phase Expanded COD (2,000 TPD) | Q2 2033 | T0 + 84mo | Full 20-module deployment; 60mo from Phase Initial COD |
| CSA term end | Q2 2058 | T0 + 30yr | 30-year CSA from Phase Initial COD |
Hard external deadline framing: No regulatory hard deadline applies. Council Authorization Deadline = Phase Initial COD − 24 months = Q2 2026. Slippage past Q4 2026 moves Phase Initial COD into 2029. Deferral cost: each 6-month slip ≈ $1.8–$2.2M Year-2 Royalty foregone (Phase Initial scale).
§7Community Value Stack
County fiscal effects (Royalty receipts, cost displacement) and regional economic effects (employment, regional GDP) are distinct categories — never combined into a single benefit line. §7.1 is County treasury effects. §7.2 is regional economic effects.
§7.1County Fiscal Effects
- Beneficiation Fee paid (outflow): Phase Initial Year 1 at $3.65M annual; escalates with phase ramp.
- Circular Royalty™ received (inflow): $0 Year 1 (13-month lag); ~$4.4M Year 2 (Phase Initial); ~$114M annual at Phase Expanded steady-state.
- Avoided disposal cost (cost displacement, not treasury inflow): ~$3.0M Year 1 → ~$75M+ annual at Phase Expanded.
- 30-year combined fiscal benefit (full Phase Expanded with Tier 3 partnerships): ESTIMATED ~+$3B+
- Capital obligation: $0.
§7.2Regional Economic Effects
These flow to the Minot Triangle economy — not to the County treasury.
| Phase | Direct FTE | Indirect Jobs (×2.5) | Annual Regional Economic Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phase Initial | 25 | 63 | ~$4M |
| Phase Medium | 70 | 175 | ~$14M |
| Phase Expanded | 280 | 700 | ~$58M |
Plus property tax base addition of $75M–$1.17B (phase-dependent capital improvement) for the host jurisdiction.
§8Why This Works in Minot
Volume alignment. Ward County alone generates ~100 TPD — exactly matching Phase Initial design capacity. The 50-mile catchment plus Tier 3 universe (~5,000 TPD inferred resource) provides the scaling pathway to 2,000 TPD without any single counterparty being load-critical to Phase Expanded.
Infrastructure alignment. Minot's US-2 position is the structural logistics anchor for the entire Minot Triangle. Priority 1 site (North Minot US-2 Corridor) optimizes inbound feedstock haul from any Ward County or Tier 3 origin and is co-located on the same corridor already concentrating regional waste flow toward the City of Minot Landfill.
Contract timing alignment. No regulatory hard deadline forces an externally driven schedule. Phase Initial commits no partnership negotiation, allowing the County to authorize on its own calendar. The decision window is structural — driven by regional ACM siting capacity and the City of Minot Landfill's municipal rate-escalation trajectory.
Policy alignment. The Regulatory Predicate Transition (RPT) (§1.0) anchors the engagement to manufacturing classification under NAICS 325180, 325998, 327992, 331110, 331314, 331492. North Dakota NDDEQ has not issued state-level rules incompatible with this classification, and manufacturing classification (NAICS 31–33) is the controlling federal basis.
Regulatory driver. Federal RCRA classification timing creates a window for first-mover communities under the RPT. Ward County's dependence on a single municipal disposal facility creates structural rate-cycle exposure that intensifies with each annual escalation.
Economics specificity. Beneficiation Fee at $75/ton derives from the Minot Triangle blended FWDC planning basis ($75/ton ESTIMATED, weighted by phase ramp across Ward County and the adjacent Renville/McHenry/McLean/Mountrail 50-mile catchment). Calibrated to this community's actual disposal-cost trajectory — not a generic figure.
★Basis of Presentation
This document defines the commercial structure, deployment architecture, fiscal terms, and community value of the proposed 30-year Circular Supply Agreement with Ward County, North Dakota. Each parameter is classified by confidence tier. Final values confirm at the Deployment Study following Council authorization.
| Parameter | Value Applied | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beneficiation Fee — Year 1 | $75/ton | User-confirmed at engagement intake | Locked |
| FWDC blended planning basis | ~$75/ton | North Dakota regional gate rates + collection increment — modeled | Estimated |
| Phase Initial 100 TPD / 36,500 TPY | COD Q2 2028 | User-confirmed scaling pathway | Locked |
| Phase Expanded 2,000 TPD / 730,000 TPY | COD Q2 2033 · Conditional on Tier 3 partnerships | User-confirmed; partnership conditionality noted | Locked |
| Royalty formula and parameters | 120% base · +1pp/yr · 13mo lag · rolling monthly | Carbotura standard parameters — locked | Locked |
| T0 anchor | Q2 2026 | Carbotura standard deployment schedule; confirmation pending | Estimated |
| Employment figures | 25 / 70 / 280 direct FTE (PI / PM / PE) | Carbotura standard FTE-per-TPD ratios applied to Minot phasing | Estimated |
| Site candidates (P1, P2, P3) | Three US-2 / US-52 corridor zones; P1 North Minot preferred | Geographic and zoning analysis; pre-Term Sheet Study | Provisional |
| Operator verification | City of Minot, City of Bismarck, and City of Grand Forks (each independently municipal) ×3 | Google Places + municipal facility records, April 2026 | Verified |
Unresolved Data Gaps
- Ward County stream-specific FWDC — City of Minot Sanitation Department contract terms; resolved at Deployment Study.
- T0 confirmation — Council authorization date.
- Tier 3 partnership entity commitments (Bismarck / Grand Forks) — inter-jurisdictional coordination 2026–2028.
- North Dakota NDDEQ permit timeline — pre-application engagement at Deployment Study.
Confidence tiers: Locked = user-confirmed or contractually standard Verified = sourced to named public record Estimated = Carbotura-modeled with stated methodology Provisional = pre-Term Sheet-Study placeholder.